Drawing for Serial No. 75830887

USPTO serial 75830887

Serial No. 75830887

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 75830887?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Murray

WILLIAM D. RAMAN Wong Cabello, LLPP.O. Box 685108AUSTIN, TX 78768-5108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric power tools, namely, hammer drills, sold in retail stores, through Internet retailers, catalog distributors, industrial and construction distributors, and in hardware and home improvement centersABANDONEDMay 29, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 23, 2005CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Aug 17, 2005AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Aug 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 25, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance