USPTO serial 75831071
DILIGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DILIGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. McCollum
TIMOTHY D MCCOLLUM MCCOLLUM, BAYER & BUNCH1520 E SHAW AVE STE 103FRESNO, CA 93710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, ATHLETIC UNIFORM, BALLOON PANTS, BANDANAS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, BATHROBES, BEACHWEAR, BERMUDA SHORTS, BLAZERS, BLOUSES, BODY SUITS, BOLERO JACKETS, BOXER SHORTS, BREECHES, BRIEFS, CAPS, COATS, COVERALLS, DRESSES, DUNGAREES, FLIGHT SUITS, GLOVES, GYM SHORTS, HALTER TOPS, HATS, HEADBANDS, HEADWEAR, HOODS, JACKETS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, JEANS, JERSEYS, JOGGING SUITS, JUMPERS, JUMP SUITS, LEG WARMERS, LEGGINGS, MINI SKIRTS, MITTENS, NECK WEAR, OVERALLS, PANTS, PARKAS, POLO SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, KNIT SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, SPORT SHIRTS, SHORTS, SKI PANTS, SKI SUITS, SKI WEAR, SKIRTS, SNOW PANTS, SNOW SUITS, SOCKS, SUN VISORS, SWEAT BANDS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT SHORTS, SWEAT SUITS, SWIM TRUNKS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, TRACK SUITS, TROUSERS, TURTLE NECKS, UNDERWEAR, VESTS, WARM-UP SUITS AND WRIST BANDS AND FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |