Drawing for STEINBECK

USPTO serial 75831218

STEINBECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEINBECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell E. Radin

MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MagnetsACTIVE—
014Lapel pins, ornamental lapel pinsACTIVE—
016Bookmarks, pencils, paperweights, blank journals, notebooks, calendars, scrapbooks, posters, paper gift labels, postcardsACTIVE—
018Leather shopping bags, mesh shopping bags, textile shopping bags, book bagsACTIVE—
021MugsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, caps, hats, neckties, jackets, sweaters and shirtsACTIVE—
028Plush toys, bean bagsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing workshops on the life and works of the author John Steinbeck and distributing course materials in connection therewith, and organizing and conducting a book fair about the author John SteinbeckACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2005REINREINSTATED—
May 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 27, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 25, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance