Drawing for ROTANA

USPTO serial 75831336

ROTANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROTANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William Nix

WILLIAM NIX BAKER & BOTTS, LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0228UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRERECORDED AUDIO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS, VIDEO CASSETTES, VCDS, AND DVDS, ALL FEATURING MUSIC AND AUDIOVISUAL WORKS; BLANK AUDIO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS, VIDEO CASSETTES, VCDS AND DVDSACTIVE—
016LABELS ON AUDIO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS; VIDEOCASSETTES, VCDS, AND DVDS, BROCHURES AND PAMPHLETS ABOUT MUSIC AND AUDIOVISUAL WORKS, THE MUSIC INDUSTRY AND THE AUDIOVISUAL INDUSTRYACTIVE—
035ADVERTISING AND PROMOTING FESTIVALS FEATURING MUSIC AND AUDIOVISUAL WORKSACTIVE—
041ORGANIZING AND COORDINATING FESTIVALS FEATURING MUSIC AND AUDIOVISUAL WORKSACTIVE—
042HOSTING AND MAINTAINING A WEB SITE FOR OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE PROMOTION AND SALE OF PRERECORDED AND BLANK AUDIO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS, VIDEO CASSETTES, VCDS, AND DVDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2002PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Aug 7, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance