Drawing for Serial No. 75831360

USPTO serial 75831360

Serial No. 75831360

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 75831360?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Murray

WILLIAM D. RAMAN WONG CABELLO, LLPP.O. BOX 685108AUSTIN, TX 78768-5108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric power tools, namely, circular saws, sold in retail stores, through Internet retailers, catalog distributors, industrial and construction distributors, and in hardware and home improvement centersABANDONEDNov 12, 1976

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 14, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 10, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 10, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 10, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance