USPTO serial 75831399
TECHNET ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHNET ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CRAIG J.J. SNYDER
CRAIG J J SNYDER CRAIG J J SNYDER, PC67 WALL ST STE 2411NEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL STORES FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING, ADVERTISING AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELDS OF ENGINEERING SOFTWARE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION FOR ENGINEERING SOFTWARE AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1998 |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, AND CUSTOM SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |