USPTO serial 75831580
FLOYD D. DUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLOYD D. DUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTHA L CECIL-FEW
MARTHA L SARADUKE C/O HERSHEY CHOCOLATE & CONFECTIONERY CO4860 ROBB ST STE 204WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BUBBLE GUM | ACTIVE | Nov 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NABISCO BRANDS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NABISCO BRANDS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by HERSHEY CHOCOLATE & CONFECTIONERY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FLOYD D. DUCK
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |