Drawing for STORM TRI.CITY

USPTO serial 75831704

STORM TRI.CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STORM TRI.CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY A. SLIVER

JEFFREY A SLIVERSTE 12010050 REGENCY CIROMAHA, NE 68114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing paraphernalia, namely hats, t-shirts, jackets, windbreakers, sweat pants, sweatshirts, hockey jerseys, hockey pantsACTIVEJul 18, 1999
042Entertainment in the nature of hockey gamesACTIVEJul 18, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance