USPTO serial 75831763
RENDERVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS, DERRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENDERVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harry c. Engstrom
HARRY C ENGSTROM FOLEY & LARDNERP O BOX 1497MADISON, WI 53701-1497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, synthetic image generation software application for use in sensor modeling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |