USPTO serial 75832214
RESULTS-CENTRED LEADERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RESULTS-CENTRED LEADERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROWAN & CLARKE LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
Aurora, Ontario L4G 5V9, CA
Other trademarks owned by ROWAN & CLARKE LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN L GRANT
STEPHEN L GRANT TWIN OAKS ESTATEOLDHAM & OLDHAM CO LPA1225 W MARKET STAKRON, OH 44313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services in the nature of conducting training programs in the fields of leadership development and management, including distribution of binders, printed matter, prerecorded audiotapes and compact disks containing instructional materials as a part of the services rendered | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |