Drawing for CASUAL SEX DATELINE

USPTO serial 75832237

CASUAL SEX DATELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASUAL SEX DATELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANA B ROBINSON

DANA B. ROBINSON Dana Robinson & AssociatesP.O. Box 1416La Jolla, CA 92038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic voice messaging services, namely, recording, storing and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone and telephone telecommunications servicesACTIVENov 26, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 22, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 10, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance