USPTO serial 75832700
PLAN MEETINGS BETTER. PLAN BETTER MEETINGS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2001
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PLAN MEETINGS BETTER. PLAN BETTER MEETINGS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Candace M. Jones
CANDACE M JONES HAHN LOESER & PARKS3300 BP TWR200 PUBLIC SQCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING A WORLD WIDE WEB SITE FOR FACILITATING COMMERCIAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS OF OTHERS, NAMELY, REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL FOR THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES USED FOR PLANNING, MANAGING AND CONDUCTING MEETINGS, CONVENTIONS AND EVENTS; PROVIDING ONLINE MULTIMEDIA DIRECTORIES OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, CONVENTION AND EVENTS INDUSTRY AND ABOUT GOODS AND SERVICES USED FOR PLANNING, MANAGING AND CONDUCTING MEETINGS, CONVENTIONS AND EVENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PlanSoft Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PlanSoft Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PlanSoft Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PLAN MEETINGS BETTER. PLAN BETTER MEETINGS.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |