USPTO serial 75832918
MARSWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARSWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlinton, Heights, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Simonetetti
JOHN A SIMONETETTI GROSSMIN AND FRIEDMANTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ180 N STETSON AVE - STE 850CHICAGO, IL 60601-6712Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Web-based database software application designed to provide response management and lead fulfillment services to business users selling products (business- to-business or to consumer) including responding responding to sales leads, creating query letters, sales lead qualification, segmentation, accessing and tracking sales leads, accepting, fulfilling orders (including e-mail order confirmation), sales analysis, maintaining customer profiles and purchasing history, profitability monitoring and analysis, and provide real time information, links to business users home page online, remote access to sales data by business users configured to fit users' business needs and operations | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |