USPTO serial 75832920
SPECKLES BY REBECCA BLOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WESTON, CARL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPECKLES BY REBECCA BLOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY M. KEATS
ANTHONY M KEATS KEATS, MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVDPENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Aprons, babushkas, baby bunting, bandannas, neck bands, wrist bands, bonnets, clothing caps, shower caps, coats, evening gowns, dressing gowns, night gowns, head bands, infant wear, clothing jerseys, loungewear, miniskirts, neckerchiefs, pants, sarongs, suits and sweaters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |