Drawing for E-GIRL

USPTO serial 75833528

E-GIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-GIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard R. Fine

HOWARD R FINE TIGER ELECTRONICS, LTD980 WOODLANDS PKWYVERNON HILLS, IL 60061UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028HAND-HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; TOY JEWELRY; TOY MODEL HOBBY CRAFT KITS; ELECTRONIC NOVELTY TOYS WITH SOUND PLAYBACK, SOUND RECORDING, HOROSCOPE, AND/OR FORTUNE TELLING FUNCTIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance