USPTO serial 75833540
DOT BZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOT BZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony R. Kinney
ANTHONY R KINNEY SENNIGER, POWERS, LEAVITT AND ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer consulting services on creating and maintaining web sites, computer networks, local area networks, and wide area networks, all for others and business-to-business limited information exchange, namely, consulting on software, bandwidth, capacity for web sites, computer networks, local area networks, wide area networks, and business-to business limited information exchange; security for other's web sites, computer networks, local area networks, wide area networks and business-to business limited information exchange; hosting the web sites of others on computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; and providing a directory of organizations, individuals, addresses, and resources accessible through the use of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by e-Commerce Marketing and Media, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by e-Commerce Marketing and Media, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DOT BZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |