Drawing for PIERCESAFE

USPTO serial 75833758

PIERCESAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIERCESAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward M. Livingston

EDWARD M LIVINGSTON EDWARD M LIVINGSTON PA628 ELLEN DRPOST OFFICE BOX 1599WINTER PARK, FL 32790

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power-operated tools for use in piercing electrical cablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 4, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance