USPTO serial 75833825
FLATIRON MARKETPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLATIRON MARKETPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT PRETTY, SCHROEDER & POPLAWSKI444 S FLOWER ST19TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2921Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, MARKETING AND LEASING OF MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS WiTH SHOPPING CENTER, RESTAURANTS, HOTELS AND OFFICE BUILDINGS; SHOPPING CENTER SERVICES; AND MARKETING AND LEASING OF DEVELOPED REAL ESTATE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |