USPTO serial 75833976
EROC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EROC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeff A. McDaniel
JEFF A MCDANIEL CONEY, ROSE & TAYON, PCP O BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO SALES AND MARKETING ANALYSIS IN CONNECTION WITH ELECTRONIC COMMERCE WEB SITES; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES UTILIZING COMPUTERS TO PREDICT AND OPTIMIZE CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND CONSUMER BUYING AND AFFILIATION DECISIONS; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES FOR AUTOMATED NEGOTIATIONS, NAMELY, AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINING INDUCEMENTS FOR A PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER BASED ON THE PURCHASER'S ACTIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION, AND PRESENTING THE INDUCEMENTS TO THE PURCHASER; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES FOR OPTIMIZATION OF CROSS-SELLING OPPORTUNITIES, NAMELY, DETERMINING AND PRESENTING INDUCEMENTS TO A PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER OF A PRODUCT IN THE FORM OF OFFERS, PROMOTIONS, OR ADVERTISING FOR OTHER PRODUCTS; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING AND ANALYSIS SERVICES FOR USE IN PREDICTING RETAIL AND WHOLESALE CUSTOMER AND MARKET BEHAVIOR TRENDS; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES FOR DYNAMIC PRICING, NAMELY, DETERMINING AND PRESENTING INDUCEMENTS TO A PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IN THE FORM OF PRICE REDUCTIONS OR WAIVER OF SHIPPING OR OTHER ASSOCIATED CHARGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |