Drawing for ROUND1 PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETPLACE

USPTO serial 75834037

ROUND1 PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROUND1 PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFERY BARTON CAHN

JEFFERY BARTON CAHN SILLS CUMMIS RADIN TISCHMAN EPSTEIN & GRONE RIVERFRONT PLZNEWARK, NJ 07102-5400UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing investment and information services related to the private capital markets, namely finance and automated securities brokerage, delivered over, by, or through a computer website consisting of interviews, commentaries, reports, directories, electronic links, news analysis, securities analysis, venture capital analysis, features distribution, electronic financial reference materials and electronic magazines related to venture capital investments, securities, financial news, business, finance, current events, securities markets and potential investments; providing services consisting of automated securities brokerage, investment management services, investment banking services, venture capital services, delivered over, by or through a computer websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 26, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance