USPTO serial 75834072
PROCESS MENTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2004
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROCESS MENTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Sydney, New South Wales, AU
NORTH SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES 2060, AU
NORTH SYDNEY, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin TerraceSuite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPONENT BASED OBJECT ORIENTED APPLICATION SOFTWARE, AND NOT IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC DESIGN AUTOMATION OR ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT DESIGN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; [MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE;] COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES ALL IN THE FIELD OF DEVELOPING COMPONENT-BASED OBJECT-ORIENTED APPLICATION SOFTWARE, AND NOT IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC DESIGN AUTOMATION OR ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT DESIGN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OBJECT ORIENTED PTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OBJECT CONSULTING PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by OBJECT CONSULTING PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROCESS MENTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |