USPTO serial 75834097
SALES SYNERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2002
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SALES SYNERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Barrington, IL
Barrington, IL
Barrington, IL
Barrington, IL
Barrington, IL
Barrington, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R VIGIL
THOMAS R VIGIL ROOM 2036PYLE & PIONTEK221 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services namely conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of sales techniques | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 7, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Huelskamp, Patricia W.
- Other trademarks owned by Huelskamp, Patricia W.
- Other trademarks owned by Huelskamp, Patricia W.
- Other trademarks owned by Huelskamp, John W.
- Other trademarks owned by Huelskamp, John W.
- Other trademarks owned by Huelskamp, John W.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SALES SYNERGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |