Drawing for RICKSON GRACE

USPTO serial 75834187

RICKSON GRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICKSON GRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Evan B. Arant

EVAN B ARANT RUSS AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, Namely, T-shirts, Shorts, Sweat Suits And HeadwareACTIVE—
041CONDUCTING SEMINARS AND CLASSES ON JIU-JITSU AND CONDUCTING TOURNAMENTS AND JIU-JITSUACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance