USPTO serial 75834262
DATAJET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATAJET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EFECKTA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO
EFECKTA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO
Steamboat Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, software and firmware for data compression and storage in the field of electronic transmission of data, information and multimedia content via local and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EFECKTA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by EFECKTA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by POH International, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DATAJET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |