Drawing for LEARNNOW

USPTO serial 75834269

LEARNNOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEARNNOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry McFarland

LARRY MCFARLAND KEATS MCFARLAND & WILSON9720 WILSHIRE BLVD PENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009educational computer software, namely, interactive software to teach math and reading skills to toddlers, preschoolers, and children up to age 18; interactive software teaching kindergarten skills; and interactive software featuring a school-level encyclopedia, to be used by children and adultsACTIVE—
016educational books namely in the area of preschool, elementary and secondary math, language, science, arts, history, vocations, computers, technology, social science, health , athletics, and life skills; educational publications, namely, pamphlets, brochures, newsletters, journals, and magazines for educators, parents, and students in the areas of education theory, teaching strategies, parent involvement opportunities, parenting skills, student learning strategies and skills, improved learning environments, administration of educational programs, school improvement, curriculum and program evaluation and educational standardsACTIVE—
036providing educational scholarshipsACTIVE—
041educational testing services; educational research; arranging educational conferencesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 2, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 14, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance