USPTO serial 75834581
E-FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHIE, BRANDEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Port Coquitlam, British Columbia V3C 1S5, CA
Port Coquitlam, British Columbia V3C 1S5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark M. Yang
MARK M YANG CLARK, WILSON800 - 885 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6C 3H1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SELF SERVICE VENDING MACHINES; ELECTRONIC SELF SERVICE TERMINALS FOR ADDING VALUE TO STORED VALUE CARDS, FOR ADDING VALUE TO PREPAID ACCOUNTS, FOR PAYING BILLS AND FOR ISSUING COUPONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | ISSUING AND SUPPLEMENTING STORED VALUE CARDS; ISSUING STORED VALUE COUPONS; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ISSUING AND SUPPLEMENTING PREPAID WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CELLULAR, LONG DISTANCE AND INTERNET ACCESS ACCOUNTS; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2004 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |