USPTO serial 75834685
THE MOST EXPENSIVE REAL ESTATE IN AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE MOST EXPENSIVE REAL ESTATE IN AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABRIEL P KATONA
708 3RD AVE 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, PAMPHLETS, BOOKS, BOOKLETS, NEWSLETTERS, AND PRINTED ARTICLES FOR PUBLICATION IN PERIODICALS OF OTHERS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF RETAIL MERCHANDISING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |