USPTO serial 75835146
JAMES PURCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JAMES PURCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry N Steinhart
BARRY N STEINHART WIDOWSKI CASSIDY & STEINHART LLP425 MADISON AVE RM 700NEW YORK, NY 10017-1110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Aprons, balloon pants, beach coverups, beachwear, belts, blouses, blousons, boas, body suits, boleros, bras, bustiers, camisoles, capes, chaps, chemises, coats, dresses, dusters, evening gowns, footwear, fur cloaks, fur coats, fur jackets, fur stoles, gloves, gowns, Halloween costumes, halter tops, hats, head wear, jackets, jeans, kilts, lab coats, leather coats, leather jackets, masquerade costumes and masks sold in connection therewith, miniskirts, muffs, pants, pantsuits, petticoats, rain coats, sashes, scarves, shawls, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, stoles, suits, T-shirts, tailleurs, tap pants, veils, and wedding gowns. | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |