USPTO serial 75835655
SILVERTON RIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILVERTON RIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Titley
ROBERT L TITLEY QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATERIAL, NAMELY, PAMPHLETS, INSERTS, BROCHURES AND RECIPES CONCERNING LAMB AND VEAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSHUMANCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Strauss Veal, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Silver Ridge Farms Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SILVERTON RIDGE COMPANY, L.L.C., THE
- Other trademarks owned by SILVERTON RIDGE COMPANY, L.L.C., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SILVERTON RIDGE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |