Drawing for ROUND1 PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETPLACE

USPTO serial 75835780

ROUND1 PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROUND1 PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Barton Cahn

JEFFREY BARTON CAHN SILLS CUMMIS RADIN TISCHMAN EPSTEINONE RIVERFRONT PLZNEWARK, NJ 07102-5400UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING DATABASES FEATURING NEWS REPORTS RELATED TO PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ON-LINE RELATED TO THE PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS, NAMELY FINANCE AND SALE OF SECURITIES DELIVERED OVER, BY OR THROUGH A COMPUTER WEBSITE CONSISTING OF INTERVIEWS, COMMENTARIES, REPORTS, DIRECTORIES, ELECTRONIC LINKS, NEWS ANALYSIS, SECURITIES ANALYSIS, VENTURE CAPITAL ANALYSIS, FEATURES DISTRIBUTION, ELECTRONIC REFERENCE MATERIALS AND ELECTRONIC MAGAZINES RELATED TO VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, SECURITIES, FINANCIAL MARKETS AND POTENTIAL INVESTMENTSACTIVE—
042COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF INTERACTIVE, ELECTRONIC, AUDIO AND VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance