Drawing for EFINITY

USPTO serial 75836264

EFINITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EFINITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shawn David Olfman

PO BOX 2793WINNIPEG, MB R3C 4B4CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer Consulting; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others, designing and implementing web sites for others, designing and implementing network web pages for others, computer network auditing and consulting, computer security consulting; Integration of computer systems and networks; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 23, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 23, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 25, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance