USPTO serial 75836706
NETSURF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETSURF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY BRETSCHNEIDER
BARRY BRETSCHNEIDER RIDOUT & MAYBEE2 ROBERT SPECK PKWY STE 901MISSISSAUGA, ON L4Z 1H8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail store services in the area of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network; co-location services, computer hardware and software application development services; web site design and hosting services, web site filtering services, wide area and virtual private computer hardware and software networking services, wide area computer software networking maintenance services and computer hardware and software networking consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |