Drawing for ATHLETE OF THE CENTURY

USPTO serial 75837094

ATHLETE OF THE CENTURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAFORTE, RENE M.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATHLETE OF THE CENTURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROHIT UDAY SHENDRIKAR

ROHIT UDAY SHENDRIKAR MITCHELL, SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing concerning or depicting indicia related to sports, namely bathing suits, tops, tank tops, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, cardigans, sweaters, jackets, coats, vests, bottoms, pants, trousers, jeans, sweatpants, leggings, shorts, skorts, rompers, jumpsuits, overalls, skirts, dresses, jumpers, unitards, leotards, tights, bras, underwear, sleepwear, sleep shirts, pajamas, robes, nightgowns, footwear, shoes, boots, sandals, slippers, slipper socks, socks, hosiery, bandannas, ties, scarves, neckerchiefs, handkerchiefs, mufflers, caps and hats, headbands, gloves, belts, suspenders, cloth bibs; Halloween and masquerade costumes and masks sold in connection therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 26, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 20, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 19, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 25, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 27, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance