USPTO serial 75837323
PROCESSCITY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROCESSCITY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEAL E FRIEDMAN
NEAL E FRIEDMAN DAVIS AND BUJOLD500 N COMMERCIAL ST 4TH FLMANCHESTER, NH 03101-1151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants and factory automation software, namely, software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate production reports all in the field of process manufacturing industry; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines and newsletters in the field of process manufacturing industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distributorship in the field of process manufacturing industry; human resource services, namely, recruiting and exchanging resumes and job openings in the field of process manufacturing industry through a global computer network; business management services for the process industries by means of a global computer network; operation of a business for others, namely, process manufacturing industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the products and services of the process manufacturing industries; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the products and services of the process manufacturing industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line newsletter and magazines in the field of process manufacturing industry; providing links for computer users on a global computer network to information and websites in the field of product development and process manufacturing; providing general news and information in the field of computer software and related services for the process industries by means of a global computer network; development, operation and maintenance of a web site for use by the process industries; providing data, information and software in the field of product development and process design for process industries by means of a global computer network; creating indexes of information, websites and related resources in the field of process manufacturing via a global computer network; searching and retrieving information, sites and related resources related to process manufacturing that are available on a global computer network for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROCESSCITY.COM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |