Drawing for AGAVE BREW

USPTO serial 75837354

AGAVE BREW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGAVE BREW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033beer containing tequila derived from agave; beer flavored with tequila derived from agaveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 7, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 16, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Feb 3, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance