USPTO serial 75837424
ATHLETE OF THE CENTURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATHLETE OF THE CENTURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Berrien Springs, MI
Berrien Springs, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROHIT UDAY SHENDRIKAR
ROHIT UDAY SHENDRIKAR MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely personal appearances by a sports celebrity; entertainment services, namely motion picture, television, laser disc and video and audio tape production services; entertainment services, namely boxing tournaments and exhibitions boxing clubs; computer services, namely providing a wide variety of information in the fields of sports, entertainment recreation and games via the multi-user global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |