USPTO serial 75837451
PASSPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PASSPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR W. FISHER, III
ARTHUR W FISHER IIISTE 3165553 W WATERS AVETAMPA, FL 33634Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | investment management services, namely, strategic investment recommendations; and asset management, namely, portfolio monitoring and reporting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |