USPTO serial 75837453
M³
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 2002
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M³?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CROSBY CAPITAL PARTNERS (HONG KONG) LIMITED
99 QUEEN'S ROAD CENTRAL, HK
Other trademarks owned by CROSBY CAPITAL PARTNERS (HONG KONG) LIMITED
99 QUEENS ROAD CENTRAL, HK
99 QUEENS ROAD CENTRAL, HK
99 QUEENS ROAD CENTRAL, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL P BROOK
Mitchell P. Brook Baker & McKenzieTwo Embarcadero Center24th floorSan Francisco, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment banking; capital market services; financial analysis and consultation; financial research services; financial management; financial planning and advisory services; financial management services; financing services; fund management services; excluding mortgage lending and consultation services in the field of commercial real estate | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CROSBY CAPITAL PARTNERS (HONG KONG) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TECHPACIFIC.COM LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TECHPACIFIC.COM LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TECHPACIFIC.COM LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named M³
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2000 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |