USPTO serial 75837728
GOPIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOPIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
TOWSON, MD
GLOUCESTER, ONTARIO, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
TOWSON, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENT E BALDAUF
KENT E BALDAUF WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG436 7TH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS, MARKET RESEARCH, AND USER AUTHENTICATION FOR ELECTRONICALLY-ENABLED MERCHANTS AND INFORMATION PROVIDERS; AND PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TRANSACTION BROKER SERVICES, NAMELY THE COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND BILLINGS BETWEEN ON-LINE MERCHANTS AND CONSUMERS, AND THE PROVISION OF REVOLVING CREDIT ACCOUNT SERVICES AND BILL PAYMENT SERVICES TO OTHERS VIA THE WORLD WIDE WEB | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nortel Networks Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by GOPIN INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GOPIN CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GOPIN INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named GOPIN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |