USPTO serial 75837917
ROADBUDDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROADBUDDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald Altman
STEVEN K MARTIN ALTMAN & MARTIN6 BEACON ST STE 600BOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Personal navigation devices, namely, voice actuated and controlled hand held monitors with intelligent traffic avoidance and route calculation | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Directory Information services, namely, locating and providing information to third parties regarding locations, addresses and directions in map format via a database | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RoadBuddy Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RoadBuddy Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ROADBUDDY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |