Drawing for TEQUINOX

USPTO serial 75838025

TEQUINOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEQUINOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nate A. Garhart

NATE A GARHART COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE MARITIME PLZ 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042provision of outsourced information technology services, namely, computer infrastructure management and computer consultation, namely, provision of information technology solutions for asset management and resource planning; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail, and through the use of the Internet; integration of computer systems and networks; computer software installation, design, and maintenance for others; rental of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 8, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance