USPTO serial 75838114
TRIGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London SWlA 1ES, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rodney L. Skoglund
RODNEY L SKOGLUND RENNER, KENNER, GREIVE, BOBAK, TAYLOR &1610 FIRST NATIONAL TWRAKRON, OH 44308-1456UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations and substrances, namely pharmaceutical preparations and substances for use in treating cardiovascular diseases; pharmaceutical preparations and substances for use in inhibiting blood clotting; pharmaceutical preparations and substances for use in treating or preventing thrombosis; diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |