USPTO serial 75838356
IVILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOONEYHAM, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IVILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradford S. Breen
BRADFORD S BREEN ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy based food beverages; soy-based beverages used as a milk substitute; soup broth; peanut butter; butter substitutes; cheese and cracker combinations; cheese spreads; cheese substitutes; potato chips; cooking oil; cream cheese; processed fruits; egg substitutes; frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; luncheon meats; cooking oil; package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and processed fruit; fruit based fillings for cakes and pies; protein for use as a food additive; packaged garden salads; fruit sauces; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and raisins; soups; soup mixes; preserved truffles; yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |