USPTO serial 75838407
HYGIENICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYGIENICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J Connors
JAMES RUDOLPH1150 BEACON STBREA, CA 92821UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | manicure kits, namely, nail files, cushioned nail files, emery boards, nail buffing implements and blocks, nail sanders and cuticle sticks all sold as an unit in transparent plastic cases and replacement parts and refills therefor | ABANDONED | Aug 9, 1999 |
| 018 | plastic cases for personal grooming care implements, namely, cases for nail files, cushioned nail files, emery boards, nail buffing implements and blocks, nail sanders, cuticle sticks, tweezers, combs, hair clips, nail scissors and hair curlers all sold empty | ABANDONED | Aug 9, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |