USPTO serial 75838514
LAMON BREWSTER RELENTLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAMON BREWSTER RELENTLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. GREENSTONE
RICHARD J GREENSTONE ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAWSTE 300465 CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management; management of athletes; retail store services in the fields of clothing, sporting goods, and sports collectibles; talent agencies; distributorships of clothing and sporting equipment through a multi-level network; computerized on-line ordering services in the fields of clothing, sporting goods, and sports collectibles by means of a global computer network; computerized on-line retail store services in the fields of clothing, sporting goods, and sports collectibles by means of global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |