USPTO serial 75838639
3WEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2689657Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2003
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 3WEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2E 7S8, CA
Calgary, Alberta T2E 7S8, CA
Calgary, Alberta T2E 7S8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA N. KAUFMAN
LISA N KAUFMAN DENNISON SCHEINER SCHULTZ & WAKEMAN612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202-3402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | preparing, placing and disseminating advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 1998 |
| 038 | direct and remote access services to a global computer communications network, namely, electronic mail, electronic storage and forwarding messaging, electronic transmission of consumer and commercial data, and providing multiple user access to a global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |