USPTO serial 75838718
MOTORCYCLE PLANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOTORCYCLE PLANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Clarita, CA
Santa Clarita, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dorie G Choderker
RON HOWELL36917 BOUQUET CANYON RDSANTA CLARITA, CA 91390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | online computer services, namely, providing purchasing information in the fields of motorcycles and their parts and accessories and motorcycling by means of links to other content provider websites, providing online purchasing information in the fields of motorcycles and their parts and accessories and motorcycling, providing purchasing information in the field of clothing, head wear, footwear and other consumer goods by means of links to other content provider websites, online retail store services and mail order catalogue services in the field of motorcycles and their parts and accessories, online retail store services and mail order catalogue services in the fields of clothing, head wear, footwear and other consumer goods, and providing online market research studies and opinion polls related to motorcycles and motorcyclists | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |