Drawing for ENTELLECT ENTEGRATOR

USPTO serial 75838781

ENTELLECT ENTEGRATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENTELLECT ENTEGRATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software applications that provide website subscriber management capabilities (including access control, usage tracking and metering), system integration and control of content for websites, and transaction processing between disparate systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance