USPTO serial 75838838
LELY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LELY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
3155 PD Maasland, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
JEFFREY H GREGER MASON, MASON & ALBRIGHT2306 S EADS STP O BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate management; financial valuation of real estate; and financial investment in the field of real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction of buildings, roads, bridges and dams; laying of pipelines; and real estate development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical consultation in the field of engineering for real estate construction and development projects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |