USPTO serial 75838946
TEAMWORK INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALL, ALLISON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEAMWORK INFORMATION MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA A. SMITH
LAURA A SMITH HOFFMANN & DINEFF, LTD820 W JACKSON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software prerecorded on CD ROMs, namely computer programs in the field of storage, manipulation, transfer and retrieval of desktop publishing, electronic publishing, printing, graphics and typesetting, creation of typeface fonts, design and management of web pages on a global computer network, producing and delivering audiovisual presentations; data storage devices, namely, blank magnetic computer tapes, magnetic coded cards, blank magnetic and optical discs; computer disc drives | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely books, magazines, manuals and catalogs in the field of storage, manipulation, transfer and retrieval of desktop publishing, electronic publishing, printing, graphics and typesetting, creation of typeface fonts, design and management of web pages on a global computer network, producing and delivering audiovisual presentations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely troubleshooting of computer software problems via e-mail, phone and in person; providing on-line support services for computer program users; computer software development and design for others; consulting services in the field of computer software development and design; providing access to on-line and off-line computer database; providing on-line magazines, books, manuals and catalogs in the field of storage, manipulation, transfer and retrieval of desktop publishing, electronic publishing, printing, graphics and typesetting, creation of typeface fonts, design and management of web pages on a global computer network, producing and delivering audiovisual presentations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by teamwork information management AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TEAMWORK INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |